Thanks for the kind words Helena – as a matter of fact the FOI request was finally approved late November and the document was unsealed (barring a couple of pages which were mysteriously redacted) so I paid 40 pounds or so for the National Archives to scan the document and send to me (since I’m not in the UK). I’ve been travelling for work so haven’t had a chance to do a proper update to everything, mostly been trying to work out how I will structure Episode 5 (it will be subdivided into multiple sections/videos just for length, as is not surprising these days).

There was some interesting stuff in there actually about the demise of the crown process which confirmed things that were vague or unclear in other places I had seen them referenced. I’ll go into it more in the context of the episode but I’m glad I chased it up in the end.

I’m not sure what was on those two redacted pages but I would guess I’ll never see those, seems like they’re using some kind of GDPR type excuse re: personal info but I haven’t looked into it properly.

Interesting that for a document that was supposed to be sealed for many years to come, they decided to just unseal it for everyone at this point rather than just granting me access. It would make me wonder if anyone had even bothered requesting access since it was sealed back decades ago (David Torrance the guy who writes the House of Commons briefing documents presumably has his own backchannel access to these documents).

Glad to hear you found the behind the scenes video interesting, I’ll have to do an update soon since I have a better sense of how this is going to more forwards now.

Alex

Thanks Harry for your note, I just (finally) updated the article then. Apologies on the delay on this I’ve been busy working on Mystery Paper (the released episode and research for future episodes) and was also unsure how to manage the amount of spam going on with these comment sections, but I think I may have found a solution and so can open things up more. Thanks again.

Thanks for your comment – I agree.

I was being somewhat facetious referring to their counterfeit operation as technically ‘legal’ – I think we can probably agree that these systems are at best technically legitimate (the prime deceiver’s speciality) but not lawful in the spirit of the law or in any practical sense. This is a complex topic but I’ll slowly get to it as the Mystery Paper series unfolds. Thanks for commenting and apologies for the delayed response.

SOLI DEO GLORIA!

Who says so … the definition of LAW – contrary to LEGALESE, to which the author apparently is referencing to – is independent of the opinion about it by the actor who is acting upon it. THE LAW of “gravity” is independent of my opinion about it. So anyone saying that someone who is acting/scheming based on THE LIE – creating an ILLUSION and calling it truth – not matter how sophisticated seems to have difficulties to distinguish between TRUTH AND LIE.

THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN has planted its seeds of DECEPTION far, deep and wide.

THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ONLY!

SOLI DEO GLORIA!

The 14th. Amendment is a “grant” or “gift” of federal citizens to all persons born or naturalized in “the” United States who are under the federal government’s jurisdiction.

Peace