As time goes on, Mystery Paper has ballooned in scope and depth (not in a bad way), and each episode appears to be taking longer and longer to produce. As a one-man-band, with the bulk of my time going into my regular work and other task, the 1-2 hours I set aside daily for Mystery Paper goes by quick.
Often I’ll barely get through reading and annotating 5 pages of legislation or documentation on my tablet before the one-hour buzzer goes off and I have to get into something else. Also, the footnotes or references of those 5 pages will often lead to new suspicious documents or rabbit holes, and so the research process alone – while always interesting – can feel like it has no end in sight.
I have no intention of stopping (I feel like this is going to be something I’m working on for a long time), but I’ve been working to come up with a way to deliver some kind of content to interested people on a more regular basis, which doesn’t a) suck too much time away from me producing the actual series and b) doesn’t ‘give away’ or ruin the impact of the actual episodes as they arrive.
My current solutions are twofold:
- I publish short somewhat-frequent blog posts of ‘interesting nuggets’ from my research process. The idea is that these are somewhat unrefined reactions/observations to things I encounter which I find to be interesting/suspicious and would ordinarily otherwise just send to a few interested friends on whatsapp or telegram. These will likely not be big bold well-researched claims, but just suspicious contradictions in the official narrative which I’ve encountered along the way. Ideally these will not be ‘spoilers’ for the major ‘plot twists’ of the eventual episodes, but rather interesting tidbits which interested viewers might appreciate in the interim between episodes.
- I intermittently release some (very) short stand-alone videos which explain certain concepts in a share-able way. The Mystery Paper series is already somewhat modular in structure (by design) but the idea of these would be that I can script and produce some short explanatory videos (e.g. a minute or two) that might later find their way into an episode structure, but for now at least allow me to get out some more content and play with editorial and animation techniques and not be stuck for months and months in a perpetual research cycle. Content-wise I’d have to be careful about what topics I exactly focus on for these, because any seemingly small subject can always expand and connect to a million other things and become a feature-doc in their own right.
My questions for you (if you are subscribed to the email mailing list) are:
- Would you like to be notified by email for either of these types of updates, or only for the full episodes as they are released? I want to be sensitive to peoples’ inboxes and so I can start a new RSS feed or mailing list for these kinds of updates if that is preferable.
- Are there any particular topics or ideas that you find confusing (either for yourself, or that you struggle to explain to others) that a short stand-alone video would be useful. I obviously can’t take requests on this but it would be useful for my reference in deciding what to focus on and put effort into. Again, my goal here is not to be providing debt relief solutions and get embroiled in peoples’ specific cases, but rather to provide material to help people understand these topics on a foundational level.
Please feel free to comment or share your thoughts or opinions via email on anything here, since it’s useful for me to know what is most interesting or valuable to people. I should note that my goal here is not to provide short term ‘financial solutions’ for those who are dealing with mortgage/debt/court concerns, but rather to produce solid and credible content that can help people build a strong base of understanding of where and who we are in the context of this system/world/whatever-it-is which we find ourselves in.
Alex

HIi Alex,
l would very much like to be updated on both types of updates. Thank you for explaining “The Episode creation process” l found it very interesting and think that it is important for people to understand the deep process that you go through. l eagerly await Episode 5 and would. love to receive snippets of info that you discover along the way. Did you receive a reply to your FOI request on the 11 November 2025 that you mention in “Why so secret?” l would want to know which section of the FOI Act are they referring to that is covered by a qualified exemption. and asking them what is the qualified exemption. in this case? They say that it requires them to carry out a “Public Interest Test” and that the test is “Still being Considered” So what are they considering to be able to decide wether to carry out a “Public Interest Test”? l have experienced the same run around with a FOI here in Australia in regards to the Gardasil Vaccine, which evolved into the Office of the Australian Information Commission conspiring together with the TGA in covering up lies and the modification of the words in my FOI request over a 4 year period. l have written evidence of this claim. The different Tactics used to not reveal the truth is astounding.
What you said about using AI is significant.
Thank you greatly for the work that you are doing with this.
l am going to be showing the Mystery Papers to my 2 sisters and Brother in Law to see their response, in the hope that they may start sending out the In Power NoL,
Warmest Regards,
Helena.
Thanks for the kind words Helena – as a matter of fact the FOI request was finally approved late November and the document was unsealed (barring a couple of pages which were mysteriously redacted) so I paid 40 pounds or so for the National Archives to scan the document and send to me (since I’m not in the UK). I’ve been travelling for work so haven’t had a chance to do a proper update to everything, mostly been trying to work out how I will structure Episode 5 (it will be subdivided into multiple sections/videos just for length, as is not surprising these days).
There was some interesting stuff in there actually about the demise of the crown process which confirmed things that were vague or unclear in other places I had seen them referenced. I’ll go into it more in the context of the episode but I’m glad I chased it up in the end.
I’m not sure what was on those two redacted pages but I would guess I’ll never see those, seems like they’re using some kind of GDPR type excuse re: personal info but I haven’t looked into it properly.
Interesting that for a document that was supposed to be sealed for many years to come, they decided to just unseal it for everyone at this point rather than just granting me access. It would make me wonder if anyone had even bothered requesting access since it was sealed back decades ago (David Torrance the guy who writes the House of Commons briefing documents presumably has his own backchannel access to these documents).
Glad to hear you found the behind the scenes video interesting, I’ll have to do an update soon since I have a better sense of how this is going to more forwards now.
Alex